Gillian Hadfield is a leading proponent of the reform and redesign of legal systems for a rapidly changing world facing tremendous challenge from globalization and technology. Her extensive research examines how to make law more accessible, effective, and capable of fulfilling its role in balancing innovation, growth, and fairness. Current challenges being explored include:
- How can we develop regulatory systems to manage innovations like global digital platforms, self-driving cars, and powerful artificial intelligence systems?
- How can we dismantle the regulatory barriers that make legal help for ordinary people too expensive and inaccessible?
- How can we build better legal platforms for the four billion people in the world currently living without the benefits of stable rule of law?
Hadfield is a member of the World Economic Forum’s Global Future Council on the Future of Technology, Values and Policy and co-curates the Forum’s Transformation Map for Justice and Legal Infrastructure. She was appointed in 2017 to the American Bar Association’s Commission on the Future of Legal Education, serves as Director of the USC Center for Law and Social Science and is a member of the World Justice Project’s Research Consortium. She serves as an advisor to The Hague Institute for the Innovation of Law, LegalZoom, and other legal tech startups.
Hadfield and her work have featured widely in the media and at key events on legal innovation and technology. Cited in the New York Times, The Atlantic and Forbes, Hadfield has also been published by the Washington Post, LA Times, Reuters and CNN. Her book, Rules for a Flat World: Why Humans Invented Law and How to Reinvent It for a Complex Global Economy, was published by Oxford University Press in November 2016.
Born in Canada and a citizen of the US and the UK, Hadfield holds a J.D. from Stanford Law School and Ph.D. in economics from Stanford University. Now based at the University of Southern California, she teaches courses in legal innovation and design, the origins and evolution of the law, and contract law and strategy.
Previously, she served as clerk to Chief Judge Patricia Wald on the U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit. She has been a visiting professor at Harvard, Chicago, Columbia, Toronto, NYU, and Hastings law schools, a fellow of the Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences at Stanford, and a National Fellow at the Hoover Institution.
She is also currently teaching Legal Design Lab with Dan Ryan at the University of Southern California. Watch the video course description here:
- Law schools are letting down their students and society—here are three steps they can take to fix things - Law schools in the US today have become depressingly single-purpose.
- The playbook for companies stepping into world of politics - We have no choice but to open up a larger role for the private sector in devising new rules of the game.
- To control AI, we need to understand more about humans - Among the things we urgently need to learn more about is not just how artificial intelligence works, but how humans work.
- Disasters like Harvey and Irma show how lawyers’ stodgy rules kick Americans when they’re down - Originally published by the LA Times on September 17 2017 My house burned down in the Oakland firestorm of 1991, along with almost 3,000 others. Continue reading »
- We the people: Why legal systems should be built from the bottom up - It is one of the most powerful three-letter words in the English language, with its implications for liberty, justice and order. But law at its most fundamental Continue reading »
- Markets for health, markets for law - David Brooks has a piece today in the NYT today asking whether markets work for health care. He looks at data about what economists have found Continue reading »
- 80-20 lives: Only 20% of hours worked by solo and small firm practitioners results in money in the bank - It looks worse than I thought for the economics of small firm practitioners. John Mayer, Executive Director of CALI and developer of A2J software available to courts, Continue reading »
- The 80% tax on legal help - I'm a fan of back-of-the-envelope calculations to get a grip on the dimensions of a problem. So here's one that shows how badly legal professional Continue reading »
- Why legal aid and pro bono can never solve the access to justice problem - Here are a few back-of-the-envelope calculations to try to convey just how unrealistic it is for lawyers to focus only on legal aid/public funding and Continue reading »