The ground is shifting beneath our feet. Technology and globalization continue to uproot and reshape daily life and economics. Digital platforms connect billions around the planet in ever more complex networks of data and exchange. So why haven’t our legal systems kept up? The complexity of today’s global, digital economy, together with the advent of AI, blockchain technology, and machine learning, has pushed law to its limits, making it too expensive, too complicated, and too far out of touch with our needs. Gillian Hadfield believes we need to radically rethink how we make the rules for the 21st century. In Rules for a Flat World, she argues the legal sector can harness the same ingenuity, diversity, and investment that is powering global innovation.
- World needs 21st century regulation to police gig economy - The challenges Uber presents are replicated throughout the global economy.
- Law schools are letting down their students and society—here are three steps they can take to fix things - Law schools in the US today have become depressingly single-purpose.
- The playbook for companies stepping into world of politics - We have no choice but to open up a larger role for the private sector in devising new rules of the game.
- To control AI, we need to understand more about humans - Among the things we urgently need to learn more about is not just how artificial intelligence works, but how humans work.
- Disasters like Harvey and Irma show how lawyers’ stodgy rules kick Americans when they’re down - Originally published by the LA Times on September 17 2017 My house burned down in the Oakland firestorm of 1991, along with almost 3,000 others. Continue reading »
- We the people: Why legal systems should be built from the bottom up - It is one of the most powerful three-letter words in the English language, with its implications for liberty, justice and order. But law at its most fundamental Continue reading »
- Markets for health, markets for law - David Brooks has a piece today in the NYT today asking whether markets work for health care. He looks at data about what economists have found Continue reading »
- 80-20 lives: Only 20% of hours worked by solo and small firm practitioners results in money in the bank - It looks worse than I thought for the economics of small firm practitioners. John Mayer, Executive Director of CALI and developer of A2J software available to courts, Continue reading »
- The 80% tax on legal help - I'm a fan of back-of-the-envelope calculations to get a grip on the dimensions of a problem. So here's one that shows how badly legal professional Continue reading »
- Why legal aid and pro bono can never solve the access to justice problem - Here are a few back-of-the-envelope calculations to try to convey just how unrealistic it is for lawyers to focus only on legal aid/public funding and Continue reading »
For more articles, visit the blog page.
(Slides are here )